Don’t Hate Gizmodo Because They Did Their JOB


[Note: This is a re-post from Ploked from 4/21/10]

Over the past weekend, blurry photos of an alleged next generation iPhone managed to get into Engadget’s hands. What started out as a rumor and then thumbed by netizens as being a fake turned out to indeed be the real McCoy. Initially thought to be a Japanese clone, MacRumors has since retracted that story. The tale went like this: an Apple engineer was drinking at a bar in California and left a new iPhone prototype disguised in a case to make it appear to be a 3GS. Some one managed to find the device, waited around the bar, but no one came to claim it. He later discovered that his find was a never before seen iPhone incognito. Guy shops it around and Gizmodo buys it for $5,000. According to Gizmodo, the engineer lost the iPhone LAST month on March 18. Gizmodo managed to acquire it last week.

Photo from the Gizmodo scoop

Gizmodo extensively photo/videographed the prototype iPhone and determined that what they purchased was bonafide genuine Cupertino designed hardware. The Gawker Media technology blog (who was silent the entire weekend while Engadget enjoyed their traffic) published their next generation iPhone story on Monday and quickly racked up over three million page views (now at the verge of reaching 7 million).

Netizens continue to nitpick and cry foul at the discovery due to the nature of the iPhone’s design. The lost prototype appears to be a departure from Apple’s “unibody” and “curved” design mantra that they have slowly pushed onto all their hardware lines, including their recently released iPad.

Brian Lam, editorial head at Gizmodo, received a few calls from Apple requesting the phone back. He fired back with the request that Apple officially acknowledge that their find is a real Apple device. Apple issued a letter to Gizmodo late Monday night and Brian happily said that Jason Chen, editor in chief at Gizmodo who was in possession of the prototype, would be more than willing to send it back to Apple.

That’s not all. On Monday evening, while the tech blogosphere was going nutso (this story was even on Tuesday’s The View of all places to talk tech!), Gizmodo’s Jesus Diaz posted a story insisting they were on the cusp of discovering who was the poor Apple engineer who lost the super secret device. They discovered that it was a person named Gray Powell. They promptly plastered screenshots of his Facebook profile picture and Flickr accounts for the world to see.

Netizens quickly gripe again and call Gizmodo a douchebag for exposing the Apple employee, claiming that he will never get a job again anywhere and that he is scarred for life. Web commentators continue to slam Gizmodo for their shoddy “investigative reporting” by buying the prototype and then proceeding with unnecessary trouncing on Powell.

To add more damage points, Brian Lam then posts a snarky “apology” wishing Powell good luck and stating that tomorrow is another day. (The apology has since been retracted).

Now that you’re all caught up on the story, I’d like to say something to all the netizens that are complaining about Gizmodo’s journalism ethics:

Two words. TOO BAD.

Gizmodo’s set of writers are journalists. As reporters, their job is to report on things. Good or bad. Life-changing or not. The world didn’t feel sorry for the jerks who continued to reveal Tiger Woods’ mistresses. What about the guy who exposed ex-New York State Governor Eliot Spitzer’s little affair?

To all the people who said that Gizmodo was unethical in exposing this man, go shove it. They did their job and that’s the end of it. No one ever said the job was all butterflies and cupcakes. It might be 90% clean news for the most part, but the other 10% can be ugly and downright scary. Someone needs to do it. Gizmodo shouldn’t be scapegoated for this man’s failure to stay sober and not lose his secret iPhone.

It was a great story, and they ran with it. The fact that they told it in segments made it all the better.

If Gray Powell gets the shaft from Apple, it won’t be because of Gizmodo’s rummaging around. It’ll be because he was careless on his own accord. Move on people and get over it. This is the type of journalism that takes guts and balls. If you don’t have the fearlessness to run a story, then you probably shouldn’t be working in the news field. Running these stories separate the adults from the kids. These are the times when legends are made and Gizmodo is now basking in web traffic from every corner of the Internet.

One Response to “Don’t Hate Gizmodo Because They Did Their JOB”

  1. 1 Android Passes iPhone for the First Time « Tekunoloji

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: